It Has Been Said; "Wasting Tax Payers Dollars"
Why is the F.D.A. still in existence?
It makes no sense that something as inefficient and further, almost entirely commanded from the influence of big money corporations would still be a "functioning" part of the United States Government. Especially given the consistency of the direction within the modern government itself.
It makes much more sense simply to get rid of the F.D.A. and spend that money on other, just as frivolous fronts and ploys within the action of the U.S. government. Even further there is much more money to be made from the resulting effect of the F.D.A.'s removal from government association.
Firstly, there would be an immediate drop in overhead costs within the companies which the F.D.A. supposedly effects, which would mean an immediate increase in profit.
This in turn, would result in the immediate increase in pharmaceutical sales to counter the ill effect on society from the immediate lowering of overhead costs in the food production inustries. This would then further feed the profitability, and thus beget a more healthy dynamic for the economies concerned.
As well, this would lead to the experimentation and development of entirely new lines of drugs to treat various illnesses.... and further in that dynamic would spur a campaign within the food production industry to bolster sales of "quality" products... which of course would be just as low in overhead costs as the immediately resulting lower "quality" products they would be developed to compete with.
If they played it smart within the food industry, they could double their sales, albeit through the sales of re-introduced products meant to counter the immediate results of poor quality, illness inducing foods. As well as through employing a slander campaign which would cripple any independent food suppliers and/or restaurants.
How could the smaller establishments be producing a better product than the larger? They in no way have the credibility that the larger producers have, nor do they possess the "high standards" as can be seen in the fact that they are not as popular as the larger companies.
Seems like there is loads of money to be made through abolishing the F.D.A.
It makes no sense that something as inefficient and further, almost entirely commanded from the influence of big money corporations would still be a "functioning" part of the United States Government. Especially given the consistency of the direction within the modern government itself.
It makes much more sense simply to get rid of the F.D.A. and spend that money on other, just as frivolous fronts and ploys within the action of the U.S. government. Even further there is much more money to be made from the resulting effect of the F.D.A.'s removal from government association.
Firstly, there would be an immediate drop in overhead costs within the companies which the F.D.A. supposedly effects, which would mean an immediate increase in profit.
This in turn, would result in the immediate increase in pharmaceutical sales to counter the ill effect on society from the immediate lowering of overhead costs in the food production inustries. This would then further feed the profitability, and thus beget a more healthy dynamic for the economies concerned.
As well, this would lead to the experimentation and development of entirely new lines of drugs to treat various illnesses.... and further in that dynamic would spur a campaign within the food production industry to bolster sales of "quality" products... which of course would be just as low in overhead costs as the immediately resulting lower "quality" products they would be developed to compete with.
If they played it smart within the food industry, they could double their sales, albeit through the sales of re-introduced products meant to counter the immediate results of poor quality, illness inducing foods. As well as through employing a slander campaign which would cripple any independent food suppliers and/or restaurants.
How could the smaller establishments be producing a better product than the larger? They in no way have the credibility that the larger producers have, nor do they possess the "high standards" as can be seen in the fact that they are not as popular as the larger companies.
Seems like there is loads of money to be made through abolishing the F.D.A.
posted by Nefarious Aflatus | Monday, June 19, 2006
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home