It Has Been Said; "Anti Trust Panty Trust"
I experienced something today in a much more extreme manner than the consistency of it previous to today. The "forced" usage of a given combination of web sites through the removal of other, even better options, in an effort to secure and bolster their numbers and consequently their "value" on the market.
The experience itself was rather mundane, but as i delved further I noticed that it wasn't just a "crash" or a mishap. I use "gmail" mainly, but found that no matter how many windows I opened to the web site, I could not log into my email account. As well I found that the same was true for "blogger.com"
To illustrate this even further, it was that even with those multiple windows open to gmail and blogger and frozen there, I had no trouble what so ever accessing and using yahoo email which I use as a secondary email.
Sure, I personally can't prove that anyone working within the maintainence of the LAN I am on is placing any sort of blockage, it is still much more than coincidence and much more than a consistent occurrence.
What this is beyond illegal on many levels, is simple tasteless. Why would I want to associate myself with such desperate sorts of business tactics. Why would I be interested in investing in such companies... in the larger picture those employing such tactics are doing nothing but devaluing everyone elses genuine earnings through genuine usage and market movement.
How has this become so "standard" as practice in the business world? Why is it tolerated? it doesn't take a business genius to see how these type of people actually damage the genuine interests of others.
They are very much a toxin in several ways... the first being that they actually have convinced themselves that they are "earning" and doing good so to speak which is bad enough...... the next of which, as I have stated, their actions in doing so drop the value of everything else through their actions of posting false numbers through such manipulation......if not through a simple association with losers that do that kind of stuff.
To force the use, and therefore the larger percentage numbers posted by removing access to other options is just desperate.... if not outright greedy.
Imagine how they act around real business and money? Must be a real monkey show. Show that kind of person anything that shines and they start jumping through hoops and doing anything they can to look like they are in on it.
The Microsoft case went weird....so I guess that sent a message to the mentally ill and intellectually inferior people of the world, that such tactics are actually a healthy thing...
....somehow I don't think that was the desired result of the results within that very large trial.... but I suppose that aspect doesn't matter as a person can't expect chimps that employ such tactics purposefully to understand that.....
What I think would really top this "online dynamic" is if we could manage to put those type of people in charge of things that blow up..... and I am not talking about sex toys for the type of people they surely must be.
The experience itself was rather mundane, but as i delved further I noticed that it wasn't just a "crash" or a mishap. I use "gmail" mainly, but found that no matter how many windows I opened to the web site, I could not log into my email account. As well I found that the same was true for "blogger.com"
To illustrate this even further, it was that even with those multiple windows open to gmail and blogger and frozen there, I had no trouble what so ever accessing and using yahoo email which I use as a secondary email.
Sure, I personally can't prove that anyone working within the maintainence of the LAN I am on is placing any sort of blockage, it is still much more than coincidence and much more than a consistent occurrence.
What this is beyond illegal on many levels, is simple tasteless. Why would I want to associate myself with such desperate sorts of business tactics. Why would I be interested in investing in such companies... in the larger picture those employing such tactics are doing nothing but devaluing everyone elses genuine earnings through genuine usage and market movement.
How has this become so "standard" as practice in the business world? Why is it tolerated? it doesn't take a business genius to see how these type of people actually damage the genuine interests of others.
They are very much a toxin in several ways... the first being that they actually have convinced themselves that they are "earning" and doing good so to speak which is bad enough...... the next of which, as I have stated, their actions in doing so drop the value of everything else through their actions of posting false numbers through such manipulation......if not through a simple association with losers that do that kind of stuff.
To force the use, and therefore the larger percentage numbers posted by removing access to other options is just desperate.... if not outright greedy.
Imagine how they act around real business and money? Must be a real monkey show. Show that kind of person anything that shines and they start jumping through hoops and doing anything they can to look like they are in on it.
The Microsoft case went weird....so I guess that sent a message to the mentally ill and intellectually inferior people of the world, that such tactics are actually a healthy thing...
....somehow I don't think that was the desired result of the results within that very large trial.... but I suppose that aspect doesn't matter as a person can't expect chimps that employ such tactics purposefully to understand that.....
What I think would really top this "online dynamic" is if we could manage to put those type of people in charge of things that blow up..... and I am not talking about sex toys for the type of people they surely must be.
posted by Nefarious Aflatus | Saturday, May 13, 2006
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home